- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 20:35:20 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9722 --- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2010-05-12 20:35:19 --- We provide accessor functions for most components of the dynamic context, and I can't immediately see a good reason why we shouldn't provide current-mode(). Allowing the mode attribute on apply-templates to be set dynamically is something that requires more careful thought. A particular difficulty is that we want to know statically whether the apply-templates uses a streaming or non-streaming mode. --- Comment #2 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2010-05-12 20:35:19 --- We provide accessor functions for most components of the dynamic context, and I can't immediately see a good reason why we shouldn't provide current-mode(). Allowing the mode attribute on apply-templates to be set dynamically is something that requires more careful thought. A particular difficulty is that we want to know statically whether the apply-templates uses a streaming or non-streaming mode. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2010 20:35:23 UTC