http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9600 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> 2010-05-11 16:24:48 --- I propose we add an error to the section on constructors: 3.14.5 Constructor Functions For every atomic type in the in-scope schema types (except xs:NOTATION and xs:anyAtomicType, which are not instantiable), a constructor function is implicitly defined. <add> If a constructor function has the same name and arity as an existing function in the function signatures, a static error [err:####] is raised. </add> -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.Received on Tuesday, 11 May 2010 16:24:49 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:30 UTC