- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:14:50 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9277 --- Comment #5 from Max Toro <maxtoroq@gmail.com> 2010-03-20 01:14:50 --- > If we allowed the user to call directly a named template, passing > parameters directly, then there wouldn't be any reason to not allow > him/her to call directly a function also. So a stylesheet, in addition > to a full transform definition, could then be also a library of components > (named templates and functions) callable directly by the user. Just for the record, I never asked for a 'direct call' or 'stylesheet as a library instead of executable' feature. Simply, since we are allowed to set the stating point of the execution we should be allowed to set it's parameters. The requirements are too different to be treated as the same. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 20 March 2010 01:14:52 UTC