W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > March 2010

[Bug 9257] The rules for when an implied namespace binding conflicts should be more precise

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:57:25 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1NrgdZ-0000YU-Ad@wiggum.w3.org>

Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |mike@saxonica.com

--- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>  2010-03-16 23:57:24 ---
I think you're right. An unprefixed attribute does not (should not) imply the
namespace binding ""="". For attributes, no prefix means no namespace, and no
namespace binding is needed to establish this; there is no conflict between an
unprefixed attribute on an element, and a namespace binding such as
""="abc.uri" on the same element.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2010 23:57:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:30 UTC