- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 09:53:35 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8616 Summary: Schema simpleContent.xsd is invalid Product: XML Query Test Suite Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XML Query Test Suite AssignedTo: andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com ReportedBy: mike@saxonica.com QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org I believe the schema simpleContent.xsd is invalid. (It was introduced to support new tests testing the resolution of bug #4413, that is validateexpr-sc-1 et seq, I believe by Mary Holstege.) Line 28 has <xs:complexType name="complexExtendsEmptyMixed"> <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation> A complex type that extends a mixed content base with no content model. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> <xs:simpleContent> <xs:extension base="ss:emptyMixed"/> </xs:simpleContent> </xs:complexType> where ss:emptyMixed is <xs:complexType name="emptyMixed" mixed="true"> <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation> A complex type that is mixed but with no content model. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> <xs:sequence/> </xs:complexType> Under XSD 1.0, emptyMixed results in a complexType schema component with {contentType} = (mixed, a particle with (minOccurs=1, maxOccurs=1, term=(compositor=sequence, particles=empty))). The complexType component derived from complexExtendsEmptyMixed does not satisfy Schema Component Constraint: Derivation Valid (Extension), because none of the conditions in clause 1.4 is true: 1.4.1 is false because the {content type} of the {base type definition} is not a simple type definition 1.4.2 is false because the {content type} of the {base type definition} is not empty (it is a particle whose term is an empty sequence, which is not the same thing) 1.4.3 is false because 1.4.3.1 is false: the {content type} of the complex type definition itself [complexExtendsEmptyMixed] does not specify a particle -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 4 January 2010 09:53:36 UTC