- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:51:03 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8724 --- Comment #10 from John Snelson <john.snelson@oracle.com> 2010-02-12 00:51:02 --- (In reply to comment #9) > In discussion, I put forward an alternative suggestion: it should not be > permitted to bind a function item to a non-deterministic function. This would > mean that the compiler will always know statically when calling a dynamic > function invocation that the result is deterministic. This seems important for > optimization. Given time to reconsider, I've got sympathy with this suggestion. I don't think that the optimization options are totally lost with the possibility of non-deterministic function items (ie: partial specialization, data flow analysis), but they are complicated and I don't see an important use case for them. This approach would seem to require a firming up of the static analysis of determinism, so that the error conditions are well defined. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 12 February 2010 00:51:04 UTC