- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:52:05 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8775
Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> 2010-02-03 14:52:04 ---
In yesterday's telcon, we decided to close this with no action.
Changing a function from private to public should not require changing the name
of the function. If the rules for naming private functions are different from
the rules for naming public functions, then we may need to rename a function to
make it public.
Also, the benefits of allowing other namespaces seem minimal, and do not
justify introducing changes to the specification at this point.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2010 14:52:09 UTC