W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > December 2010

[Bug 10876] [XQuery11] Is it valid to have conflicting private functions in two different modules?

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 16:59:17 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1PSYDd-0005zl-My@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10876

Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> 2010-12-14 16:59:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Do we intend to remove this restriction?
> 
> "Every function name declared in a library module must (when expanded) be in
> the target namespace of the library module [err:XQST0048]."

We discussed this today, and decided:

1. A module is anything that conforms to the BNF
2. multiple modules may have the same target namespace
3. two private functions can have the same name if they are in modules with the
same namespace
4. we don't want to remove the above restriction

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 14 December 2010 16:59:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:33 UTC