- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 22:34:30 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11538
Summary: XQST0045 in "2.5.4.7 Function Test"
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Version: Member-only Editors Drafts
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XQuery 3.0
AssignedTo: jonathan.robie@redhat.com
ReportedBy: jonathan.robie@redhat.com
QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
<quote source="2.5.4.7 Function Test">
Implementations MAY define further annotation assertions, whose behaviour is
implementation-defined. Implementations MAY provide a way for users to create
their own annotation assertions. Implementations and users SHOULD avoid
creating new annotation assertions in the following reserved namespaces
[err:XQST0045]:
* http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace
* http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema
* http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance
* http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions
</quote>
When is XQST0045 raised?
If an implementation decides to ignore the SHOULD, it presumably does not raise
the error, and the text should be rewritten to clarify this.
If a user decides to ignore the SHOULD, is it an error or not? Or is it
implementation-defined or implementation-dependent? This is currently fuzzy.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 11 December 2010 22:34:34 UTC