- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 22:34:30 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11538 Summary: XQST0045 in "2.5.4.7 Function Test" Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT Version: Member-only Editors Drafts Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XQuery 3.0 AssignedTo: jonathan.robie@redhat.com ReportedBy: jonathan.robie@redhat.com QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org <quote source="2.5.4.7 Function Test"> Implementations MAY define further annotation assertions, whose behaviour is implementation-defined. Implementations MAY provide a way for users to create their own annotation assertions. Implementations and users SHOULD avoid creating new annotation assertions in the following reserved namespaces [err:XQST0045]: * http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace * http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema * http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance * http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions </quote> When is XQST0045 raised? If an implementation decides to ignore the SHOULD, it presumably does not raise the error, and the text should be rewritten to clarify this. If a user decides to ignore the SHOULD, is it an error or not? Or is it implementation-defined or implementation-dependent? This is currently fuzzy. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 11 December 2010 22:34:34 UTC