- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 22:09:13 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11495
Summary: Harmonize 'absent' and 'undefined'; declare which
properties can be absent
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Version: Working drafts
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Data Model 3.0
AssignedTo: ndw@nwalsh.com
ReportedBy: ndw@nwalsh.com
QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
In resolving the question of terminology around namespaces, we decided to
define a new term 'absent'. The definition of that term is perilously close to
the definition of 'undefined', surely they could be harmonized somehow? If not,
the spec should articulate the distinction more clearly.
On the subject of absent properties, we should also define which properties can
be absent.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 7 December 2010 22:09:15 UTC