- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 17:56:25 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9600 --- Comment #4 from Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org> 2010-04-29 17:56:24 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Arguably we should rely more on declarative statements of constraints, like > this one in 2.1.1: "Each function is uniquely identified [within the static > context] by its expanded QName and its arity (number of parameters).", and > worry less about enumerating all the situations that can cause the constraint > to be violated. So then we'd just say something like "It is a static error [err:XQST0034] if any situation causes that constraint to be violated." ? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:56:27 UTC