- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:34:29 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9600
Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mike@saxonica.com
--- Comment #2 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2010-04-29 15:34:29 ---
Arguably we should rely more on declarative statements of constraints, like
this one in 2.1.1: "Each function is uniquely identified [within the static
context] by its expanded QName and its arity (number of parameters).", and
worry less about enumerating all the situations that can cause the constraint
to be violated. Though it makes a useful test case for implementations.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2010 15:34:31 UTC