- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:34:02 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7935 --- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2009-10-16 17:34:02 --- I would think that the result of normalizing codepoints that are not assigned to any character should be to leave the codepoint unchanged in the result. I'm pretty sure this is what the reference implementation from the Unicode Consortium does. It's always a problem of course when you want to reuse library code that has made a different decision, but I think that as with regexes, we should avoid letting that implementation concern influence our spec. And I don't think we should be making value judgements that certain codepoints or characters are bad. Some of our users might think it good that there are codepoints they can use as they like. For better or worse we've chosen to make them legal, and that's good enough. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 16 October 2009 17:34:04 UTC