- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:00:45 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8219
Oliver Hallam <oliver@cbcl.co.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |oliver@cbcl.co.uk
--- Comment #2 from Oliver Hallam <oliver@cbcl.co.uk> 2009-11-06 20:00:45 ---
Let me summarize the effects of the two interpretations:
Interpretation 1:
a) If the source node has a relative xml:base attribute then the base URI is
computed with this uri resolved against the uri of the xsl:copy instruction.
The xml:base attribute itself is not copied.
b) Otherwise the base URI of the source node is used.
c) xml:base attributes that appear in the copied node are ignored for
purposes of computing the node's base URI.
Interpretation 2:
a) If the copied node has an xml:base attribute then this is resolved against
the base URI of the xsl:copy instruction.
b) Otherwise the base URI of the source node is used.
Surely the intention of this sentence was interpretation 2 and it was just
poorly worded?
If the intention was indeed interpretation 1, then what was the justification
for adding this condition?
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 6 November 2009 20:00:54 UTC