W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > May 2009

[Bug 6926] [XQTS] Catalog file has DTD errors.

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 07:16:55 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1M72WN-0002OZ-0M@wiggum.w3.org>

--- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>  2009-05-21 07:16:54 ---
Sorry about that, should now be fixed.

Anyone know why we have a DTD for the catalog (as well as a schema), and why
the DTD imposes constraints that are not present in the schema? We seem to be
making our lives unnecessarily difficult.

The reason I didn't include the section numbers in the tests is of course that
(a) there isn't yet a published spec that integrates the higher-order-functions
specification, so the section number isn't known, and (b) if there were, it
could presumably change before release.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 21 May 2009 07:17:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:27 UTC