- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:44:22 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6904
Andrew Eisenberg <andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com |mike@saxonica.com
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Eisenberg <andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com> 2009-05-13 22:44:22 ---
I disagree. I expect an implementation that doesn't support an optional feature
to fail the tests for that feature.
Looking at these test cases, I note that they are in the Schema Import Feature
group. I think that they'd be better placed in their own group in the Optional
Features group. This will help us ee more clearly the adoption of this
function.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 13 May 2009 22:44:33 UTC