- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 02:15:04 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5348
Andy Agrawal <guerneca2003@yahoo.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |guerneca2003@yahoo.com
--- Comment #5 from Andy Agrawal <guerneca2003@yahoo.com> 2009-03-21 02:15:04 ---
The way this is worded seems to imply that at most 99 backreferences are
allowed. Is this the intent?
The sentence I'm referring to is:
"The construct \N where N is a
single digit is always recognized as a back-reference; if this is followed by
further digits, these digits are taken to be part of the back-reference if and
only if the resulting number NN is such that the back-reference is preceded by
NN or more opening parentheses"
Is there any reason to impose a limit of 99? Of course, I can't imagine any
real use cases that would need more than 99 backreferences, but why impose an
arbitrary limit in the language itself?
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 21 March 2009 02:15:12 UTC