W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > March 2009

[Bug 6513] [XQuery] inconsistent terminology in definition of derives-from()

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:53:23 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1LjF7z-000749-NR@wiggum.w3.org>

--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com>  2009-03-16 15:53:23 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> >the ISSD contains all statically known types
> This may be your understanding, but it's not mine. My understanding is that
> import-schema (like import-module, and like xs:import) imports a namespace, and
> licenses the use of names in that namespace. It does not license (or make
> "in-scope") any names from any other namespace, for example a namespace that is
> imported transitively, or a namespace that is imported by a different query
> module.

Are you talking about the same issue that this bug is about?

Any type that is statically known is in the ISSD. Whether schema import is
transitive or non-transitive, statically known definitions are in the ISSD.


Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 16 March 2009 15:53:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:26 UTC