http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6665 --- Comment #5 from Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org> 2009-03-10 00:31:34 --- (In reply to comment #4) > > Well, I would expect that a single match option cannot be redefined if it has > been defined before. That would prevent later/inner FTMatchOptions from overriding earlier/outer FTMatchOptions, which is explicitly intended. > Did you have a special reason to allow redefinitions here? If by "here", you mean "in FTOptionDecls in the Prolog", then I'm not sure we have a special reason to allow them there -- it might just be a particular example of the general intent. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.Received on Tuesday, 10 March 2009 00:31:43 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:26 UTC