- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:34:59 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6946
Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jmdyck@ibiblio.org
--- Comment #1 from Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org> 2009-06-08 16:34:59 ---
> Indeed the "ftusecases.xml" documents contains the substring "task?",
> "specialist.", and "next?". However, if the full-text tokenizer interprets
> periods as sentence delimiters, and not as parts of tokens, the periods will
> not be passed on to the wildcard evaluator. This is why both of the following
> queries
>
> "task?" ftcontains "task?",
> "task?" ftcontains "task?" with wildcards
>
> will lead to the internal comparison "task" <-> "task?", and will both return
> false.
But note that tokenization is applied, not just to the search item, but also to
the query strings. If the latter's tokenization also interprets punctuation as
token-delimiters, then the internal comparison will be
"task" <-> "task"
and the queries will return true.
By the way, did you intend "with wildcards" for cases [2] and [3]?
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 8 June 2009 16:35:06 UTC