- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:55:55 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6186 --- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2009-01-30 10:55:54 --- This was discussed by the XSL WG on 2009-01-29. The result was the following action: Action A-2009-01-29-003: [Bug 6186] Michael Kay to investigate how XPath and F&O handle references to Unicode character properties and character properties database, and propose aligning XSLT with them. XPath 2.0 has in its normative references: Unicode The Unicode Consortium. The Unicode Standard Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 2003, as updated from time to time by the publication of new versions. See http://www.unicode.org/unicode/standard/versions for the latest version and additional information on versions of the standard and of the Unicode Character Database. The version of Unicode to be used is implementation-defined, but implementations are recommended to use the latest Unicode version. Identical text appears in the normative references of Functions and Operators. I propose that we add the same text to Appendix A.1 of XSLT 2.0 (Normative References), linking to it from the places cited in this bug report. ("implementations are recommended" is horribly ungrammatical: it's the latest version that is being recommended, not the implementation. I'm very tempted to change it to "implementations are advised". But we can live with the existing text in the interests of bug-compatibility.) -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 30 January 2009 10:56:03 UTC