- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:16:38 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6027 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> 2009-01-12 21:16:37 --- Jim Melton and I attempted to resolve issues raised at the last meeting with the following language: ------------- 5.2 EBNF Extensions The XQuery language is defined in this specification. The XQuery EBNF is defined in [Appendix A: XQuery EBNF]. Any extensions to the EBNF are not part of the XQuery language. Users can determine whether a query uses grammar not found in the EBNF by using the XQuery applets [APPLETS]. An implementation that otherwise conforms to this specification may also recognize and evaluate syntax that is not part of the XQuery EBNF. Such an implementation remains conformant to this specification, provided such extensions do not otherwise conflict with the syntax and rules of this specification. Future versions of XQuery may extend the EBNF in ways that conflict with extensions provided by implementations of this specification, thus causing such implementations to become non-conforming. ---------------- <quote> err:XPST0003 It is a static error if an expression is not syntactically valid, using the syntax defined in Appendix A.1 EBNF plus any implementation-defined EBNF extensions. </quote> </quote> -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 12 January 2009 21:16:48 UTC