- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:55:41 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6376 --- Comment #1 from Henry Zongaro <zongaro@ca.ibm.com> 2009-01-06 21:55:41 --- It looks like the Serialization recommendation is inconsistent about its presentation of examples. In most cases they are not marked as "Notes." They are usually contained in boxes - see [1], which at least begins "For example," or [2], which just asks us to "Consider...." But some examples are just contained within the normative prose without anything to set them apart typographically - see the "media-type" parameter in [3] or the second paragraph following the table in [3]. Obviously this should all be cleaned up for 1.1, but I doubt we'd want to issue a 1.0 erratum. Should it be cleaned up for the 1.0 2nd edition though? [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-xslt-xquery-serialization-20070123/#XML_VERSION [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-xslt-xquery-serialization-20070123/#xml-undeclare-NS [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-xslt-xquery-serialization-20070123/#serparam -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 6 January 2009 21:55:49 UTC