- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:59:16 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6027 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> 2009-01-06 15:59:15 --- I propose that we add this section to Conformance: <add> 5.2 BNF Extensions The XQuery language is defined in this specification. Any extensions to the BNF are not part of the XQuery language. Users can easily determine whether a query uses grammar not found in our EBNF by using the XQuery applets [APPLETS]. As a Working Group, we control the XQuery BNF. If a vendor extends the BNF in their product, that has no bearing on extensions we make in the future, even if they are incompatible with existing vendor extensions. </add> In addition, we should consider whether to soften this error text: <quote> err:XPST0003 It is a static error if an expression is not a valid instance of the grammar defined in A.1 EBNF. </quote> -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 6 January 2009 15:59:24 UTC