- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:21:34 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8504 --- Comment #4 from Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> 2009-12-16 14:21:34 --- >It tests that a processor can handle invalid input - which is surely a >reasonable test? Indeed this is reasonable, but these a Then this test case should be marked as expecting a parse error in the XQueryX case. Our implementation raises a System.Xml.Schema.XmlSchemaValidationException which we report directly - rather than reporing it as XPST0003 which would be inappropriate since this is XQueryX we're dealing with. (XPST0003: It is a static error if an expression is not a valid instance of the grammar defined in A.1 EBNF) Or do you suggest that we attempt to observe XPTY0004 by static type analysis of a syntactically invalid XQueryX program? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 16 December 2009 14:21:39 UTC