[Bug 8408] Clarification on StringExcludes and Windows

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8408


Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jmdyck@ibiblio.org




--- Comment #1 from Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org>  2009-12-07 03:10:10 ---
> Applying FTNot and then FTAnd would yield three matches, each with
> the StringInclude of the single occurence of "efficient" (within <p>),
> and a StringExclude that corresponds to the occurences of "and"

Actually, I think you'll find it yields a single match, containing the one
StringInclude and all three StringExcludes. See the example in 4.2.6.3
FTUnaryNot, in which FTUnaryNot transforms:
  an AllMatches containing 3 Matches each with 1 StringInclude
into:
  an AllMatches containing 1 Match with 3 StringExcludes.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Monday, 7 December 2009 03:10:19 UTC