- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:23:06 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6131
--- Comment #24 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2009-08-26 09:23:06 ---
>> EQname: QName | UriLiteral ':' NCName /* ws:explicit */
In many ways this suggestion is attractive. However, there is one context where
it wouldn't work well:
<xsl:value-of select="key('my:key', 1234)"/>
<xsl:value-of select="system-property('my:operating-system', 1234)"/>
<xsl:if test="function-available('my:function')"/>
Replacing the lexical QNames here by an EQName as proposed here would require
use of escaped quotation marks ("), which is unappealing.
So perhaps we should adopt this, but also introduce backtick as a third kind of
quotation mark for use in all contexts where we currently allow paired
double-quotes or single-quotes? Or perhaps just as a third option for a
UriLiteral?
An alternative would be to use a different format (such as {uri}local) for
run-time QNames, but that's not nice either.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 26 August 2009 09:23:15 UTC