- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:28:24 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7371 --- Comment #2 from Justin Johansson <procode@adam.com.au> 2009-08-19 21:28:24 --- Thanks for the qualification, Mike. Case is at the moment I happen to be writing an XQuery Update Facility - compatible/emulation layer for an existing XML database product which has XQuery-only capability but is unlikely to have XQuery Update built into it for quite some time. So the reason I happened across the issue is that I consulted the Candidate Recommendation only a few hours ago for this very function, so as to understand the functionality required and to copy the signature for my XQuery Update emulator function of the same name (in my emulator namespace). Then I said to myself, "bugger", I have to check for empty attribute sequence before I can call this one :-) Given that expert advice is "...so it doesn't make much difference whether the function signature allows one" then it would not be too much of an imposition to accommodate me? Please. Thanks, guys. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:28:33 UTC