- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:01:47 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5332 --- Comment #21 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> 2009-04-28 13:01:47 --- > It might be explicit but it's not complete, for example it leaves out > > ((())) > > I can't see why you are trying to improve the text which we arrived at so > painfully. Because the reader can not easily determine what is and what is not a vacuous expression without reading the entire specification and thinking about it. Because someone designing a test suite would have a hard time determining the complete list. Because searching for terms like "is a vacuous expression" in the text also apparently leaves out some instances, like the one you just cited. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2009 13:01:57 UTC