- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:07:18 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5332 --- Comment #14 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> 2009-04-27 23:07:17 --- (In reply to comment #13) > On 25 Feburary, the WG decided to change the definition to address concerns > raised by Zhen: > > RESOLVED: Change the definition of Vacuous Expression to: > > [Definition: Certain expressions are defined in this specification > to be "vacuous expressions". These all have the characteristic that > they can be determined statically to either return an empty > sequence or raise an error.] Some expressions are always vacuous; > for instance, an empty parenthesized expression ( ) is a vacuous > expression. Other expressions may be vacuous if one of their > operands is vacuous; for instance, if both branches of a > conditional expression are vacuous, the conditional expression is a > vacuous expression. > In the editor's draft, I changed this definition to the following, which I believe to be equivalent: [Definition: A "vacuous expression" is an expresson that can be determined statically to always return an empty sequence or raise an error.] Some expressions are always vacuous; for instance, an empty parenthesized expression ( ) is a vacuous expression. Other expressions may be vacuous if one of their operands is vacuous; for instance, if both branches of a conditional expression are vacuous, the conditional expression is a vacuous expression. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 27 April 2009 23:07:26 UTC