- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:06:42 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5332
Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jonathan.robie@redhat.com
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> 2009-04-24 17:06:42 ---
On 25 Feburary, the WG decided to change the definition to address concerns
raised by Zhen:
RESOLVED: Change the definition of Vacuous Expression to:
[Definition: Certain expressions are defined in this specification
to be "vacuous expressions". These all have the characteristic that
they can be determined statically to either return an empty
sequence or raise an error.] Some expressions are always vacuous;
for instance, an empty parenthesized expression ( ) is a vacuous
expression. Other expressions may be vacuous if one of their
operands is vacuous; for instance, if both branches of a
conditional expression are vacuous, the conditional expression is a
vacuous expression.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 24 April 2009 17:06:52 UTC