- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:49:12 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6811 --- Comment #2 from Christian Gruen <christian.gruen@gmail.com> 2009-04-23 19:49:12 --- Hi Jim, sorry for persisting.. As the current text states that "The weight MUST have an absolute value between 0.0 and 1000.0 inclusive.", I am not sure if implementation-defined, negative weights are considered at this point. Next to that, was there a special reason to use "1000" as value/introduce a restriction at all? I would rather have expected a strict rule (0.0 - 1.0) or no restriction at all. And, another trivia here.. I wonder why a weight value is defined by a "RangeExpr". as I would expect the weight to be always exactly one value. The existing rule... [145] FTWeight ::= "weight" RangeExpr ..would allow expression such as "A" ftcontains "A" weight (1 to 2) which will not make too much sense. Anyway, as usual.. if I have stopped thinking too early - please tell me! Thanks, Christian -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 23 April 2009 19:49:22 UTC