W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > April 2009

[Bug 6811] [FT] Specification/Weights

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:49:12 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Lx4v2-0006fw-Nv@wiggum.w3.org>

--- Comment #2 from Christian Gruen <christian.gruen@gmail.com>  2009-04-23 19:49:12 ---
Hi Jim, sorry for persisting.. As the current text states that "The weight MUST
have an absolute value between 0.0 and 1000.0 inclusive.", I am not sure if
implementation-defined, negative weights are considered at this point. Next to
that, was there a special reason to use "1000" as value/introduce a restriction
at all? I would rather have expected a strict rule (0.0 - 1.0) or no
restriction at all.

And, another trivia here.. I wonder why a weight value is defined by a
"RangeExpr". as I would expect the weight to be always exactly one value. The
existing rule...

  [145] FTWeight ::= "weight" RangeExpr

..would allow expression such as 

  "A" ftcontains "A" weight (1 to 2)

which will not make too much sense. Anyway, as usual.. if I have stopped
thinking too early - please tell me!


Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 23 April 2009 19:49:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:27 UTC