W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > April 2009

[Bug 6843] New: Primitive simple types: removed or not?

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:32:30 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-6843-523@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6843

           Summary: Primitive simple types: removed or not?
           Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
           Version: Proposed Recommendation
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Data Model
        AssignedTo: alb.w3c@gmail.com
        ReportedBy: fgeorges@gmail.com
         QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org


Hi,

  In the current PER for XDM, the definition of "primitive simple
type" has been changed from:

http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-datamodel/#dt-primitive-simple-type

    There are 23 primitive simple types: the 19 defined in
    Section 3.2 Primitive datatypesXS2 of [Schema Part 2] and
    xs:untyped, xs:untypedAtomic, xs:anyAtomicType,
    xs:dayTimeDuration, and xs:yearMonthDuration], defined in 2.6
    Types.

to:

http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/PER-xpath-datamodel-20090421/#dt-primitive-simple-type

    There are 21 primitive simple types: the 19 defined in
    Section 3.2 Primitive datatypesXS2 of [Schema Part 2] and
    xs:untypedAtomic and xs:anyAtomicType], defined in 2.6 Types.

  So from the 5 additional types, only 2 are still there.  But
section 2.6.2 still defines all 5 types
<http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/PER-xpath-datamodel-20090421/#types-predefined>.

  Is that normal?

  Regards,

-- 
Florent Georges
http://www.fgeorges.org/


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 23 April 2009 15:32:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:27 UTC