- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:05:20 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5874
Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jonathan.robie@redhat.com
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> 2008-09-23 17:05:19 ---
We agree with your reading. See in particular the processing model
(http://www.w3.org/TR/xqupdate/#id-processing-model) and the consistency
constraint check in upd:applyUpdates
(http://www.w3.org/TR/xqupdate/#id-upd-apply-updates, see especially point 5).
We don't want to add new conditions to the description of upd:insertAttributes
to cover this one consistency constraint that might be detected later in
upd:applyUpdates, but we do think it would add clarity to modify this
statement:
<old>
attributes: Modified to include the nodes in $content.
</old>
To use the word "add":
<new>
attributes: Modified to add the nodes in $content.
</new>
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2008 17:05:59 UTC