http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5696 Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tim@cbcl.co.uk --- Comment #3 from Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> 2008-10-28 13:00:12 --- Haskell has type classes, described at http://www.haskell.org/tutorial/classes.html which seem like a very well designed way of describing the sort of constraints on types suggested by Option 2. This might be a useful addition to XQuery. As an off-topic aside, I'm personally a bit wary of try ... catch. I've got a horrible feeling I'm turning into a functional purist. Even element constructors make me feel queazy :) -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2008 13:00:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:24 UTC