http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5702 ------- Comment #1 from mike@saxonica.com 2008-05-20 17:12 ------- Section 2.4.2 in fact says (in a Note) that it is "implementation-defined". But I fully agree with the comment, there is no reason for the WG to be indecisive on this question. I really don't care much whether deleting a parentless node is a no-op or an error, but I think the spec should define it one way or the other. Tossing a coin, I would make it a no-op (the only defined behaviour of delete is to detach from the parent, and when the initial state is the same as the desired state, a no-op seems appropriate.)Received on Tuesday, 20 May 2008 17:13:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:23 UTC