- From: <bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 17:03:31 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5646 ------- Comment #4 from john.snelson@oracle.com 2008-05-20 17:03 ------- I've raised this before as well in Bug #4167. a) I believe that fn:put() should be an updating expression - it makes no sense for it not to be. b) I don't think it's obvious that fn:put() should "serialize" post-update nodes - XQilla currently returns pre-update copies of nodes passed as arguments to fn:put(). c) It would be helpful if fn:put() was described in terms of the pending update list, and if that was used to resolve conflicting put operations. d) Many useful queries don't pass the pessimistic XQuery static typing rules :-(.
Received on Tuesday, 20 May 2008 17:04:06 UTC