- From: <bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 20:02:32 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5684
andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com |frans.englich@telia.com
------- Comment #1 from andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com 2008-05-15 20:02 -------
We ran into this issue long ago. My recollection is that agreed to use explicit
timezones in most of our test cases, and to use Z as the expected value of the
implicit timezone in just a small number of the test cases.
Perhaps I recall wrongly, or perhaps we changed this over time. I went looking
for precedent, and found that in fn-implicit-timezone-2 that we expect "-PT5H"
and the comparator is Inspect.
Received on Thursday, 15 May 2008 20:03:07 UTC