- From: <bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 08:34:00 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3818
jmdyck@ibiblio.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status Whiteboard| |need to create erratum and
| |modify doc; consider for 1.1
------- Comment #19 from jmdyck@ibiblio.org 2008-05-15 08:34 -------
(In reply to comment #18)
> Sorry, but my view is that the proposed fix is a hack to get around the more
> general problem I described in Comment 13 ( "treat as" / "as" throws away
> static type information).
I'm inclined to agree.
> Close the bug if you like, but I would be grateful for an explanation of why
> the type rules actively throw away information, the effect of which appears
> only to have the purpose of making static typing implementations reject
> perfectly reasonable queries.
I haven't yet found an explanation. I think we should reconsider those type
rules for the 1.1 doc (and I have marked the Status Whiteboard accordingly).
Received on Thursday, 15 May 2008 08:34:38 UTC