- From: <bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 08:34:00 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3818 jmdyck@ibiblio.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |need to create erratum and | |modify doc; consider for 1.1 ------- Comment #19 from jmdyck@ibiblio.org 2008-05-15 08:34 ------- (In reply to comment #18) > Sorry, but my view is that the proposed fix is a hack to get around the more > general problem I described in Comment 13 ( "treat as" / "as" throws away > static type information). I'm inclined to agree. > Close the bug if you like, but I would be grateful for an explanation of why > the type rules actively throw away information, the effect of which appears > only to have the purpose of making static typing implementations reject > perfectly reasonable queries. I haven't yet found an explanation. I think we should reconsider those type rules for the 1.1 doc (and I have marked the Status Whiteboard accordingly).
Received on Thursday, 15 May 2008 08:34:38 UTC