http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3771 jmdyck@ibiblio.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | ------- Comment #6 from jmdyck@ibiblio.org 2008-03-10 04:32 ------- It occurs to me that this approach is unsound. For instance, consider: element e { text {"foo"}, attribute a {"x"} } The rules given in comment #1 or comment #2 will accept this and assign it a static type, but we know that dynamically it will raise a type error, because an attribute node follows a non-attribute node in the element constructor's content sequence.Received on Monday, 10 March 2008 04:32:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:22 UTC