- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:01:10 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5795 --- Comment #11 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2008-06-26 13:01:10 --- >So do you think it conformant behaviour? I wouldn't dare to venture an opinion. With static typing, nothing (not even a failure to report a statically detectable error) would surprise me. But I think there comes a time when a test suite has to take a pragmatic view. The rules on errors and optimization license an implementation to throw an error for the query 2+2. I don't think that means the test suite should list this as an approved result. There comes a time when you have to report that you consider your result conformant even though it's not the expected result that was published. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2008 13:01:47 UTC