- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 22:26:00 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5849
--- Comment #2 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2008-07-10 22:26:00 ---
I agree entirely with the analysis of the XSLT 1.0 spec in comment #1. Indeed,
the results match what Saxon 6.5.5 outputs, with one exception: Saxon numbers
a[1] as nr="1". The spec doesn't say what happens if there is no node that
matches the "from" pattern; Henry decided to discard all the nodes, whereas in
Saxon I guess I decided to retain them all.
According to various contributors to the xsl-list, here's a survey of what
various products do with this stylesheet. The eight columns are the values of
the nr attribute on the 8 <a/> elements, with "-" indicating that the attribute
is empty.
Saxon 6.5.5 1 1 2 3 4 1 2 3
Saxon 9.1.0.1 - 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Saxon 9.1.0.2 - 2 3 4 5 2 3 4
Gestalt - 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Xalan 1.9 0 2 3 4 0 6 7 8
LibXSLT 1.1.22 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
Xalan-C 1.10 0 2 3 4 0 6 7 8
Xalan-J 2.7.1 0 2 3 4 0 6 7 8
Intel 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
MSXML3 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3
.NET 1.0 - 1 2 3 - 1 2 3
.NET 2.0 - 1 2 3 4 1 2 3
As far as I can see the only two results that are defensible are
(a) - 1 2 3 4 1 2 3
(b) 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
with the main argument in favour of (a) being backwards compatibility with the
1.0 spec, though since implementations are so inconsistent this cannot be a
very strong argument. The XSLT 2.0 spec, which produces
(c) - 2 3 4 5 2 3 4
does not seem defensible: if the "from" node is regarded as the last in the
previous run, then the first node after the "from" node should be numbered 1,
not 2.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 10 July 2008 22:26:48 UTC