- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:49:09 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5278 ------- Comment #1 from mike@saxonica.com 2008-01-31 17:49 ------- Discussed on 31 Jan 2008. There was a range of views, converging on a consensus that we should at least say that implementations "may" treat this as a recoverable error, and leaning towards a "should". Editor asked to produce wording reflecting this.
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2008 17:49:23 UTC