- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:40:38 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5333 ------- Comment #4 from jonathan.robie@redhat.com 2008-01-22 19:40 ------- Mike's amendment in #c3 makes this consistent with: http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery/#id-content (D. The in-scope-namespaces property of a copied element node.) We should also want symmetry with the result of modifying the original in place and copying it over. We can't have symmetry both ways.
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2008 19:40:43 UTC