- From: he harrison <harrison076@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:03:08 +0800
- To: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
- Cc: "Frans Englich" <englich@kde.org>, public-qt-comments@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2008 11:03:13 UTC
Right, I've already raise this quesion in the talk @ x-query.com and got a lot of valuable help from experts like Micheal, Jonathan and so on. The focus now has turned to whether the "redefine" violate the consistency constraints. Seems I have to wait a while for official interpretation from the W3C working group 2008/1/15, Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>: > > > > > This list tend to be a bit slow. > > This list is for formal comments on the XQuery and related specifications. > The preferred way of raising such comments is in the Bugzilla system (see > the introduction to the specs for details); but raising them here is an > acceptable alternative. Either way, the comment will find its way onto an > agenda of the working group concerned, and will eventually receive a > formal > response. This will often take some weeks. You may get personal responses > before the Working Group considers the comment, but they will have no > official standing. > > If you want a quick discussion and the personal views of knowledgeable > people, then the talk @ x-query.com list is a better venue. If you want an > official interpretation from the W3C working group, you need to ask here > or > on Bugzilla, but it will take longer. > > Michael Kay > http://www.saxonica.com/ > > >
Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2008 11:03:13 UTC