- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 01:09:54 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5334
chamberl@almaden.ibm.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
------- Comment #1 from chamberl@almaden.ibm.com 2008-01-15 01:09 -------
Eliminating XUTY0004 seems reasonable. It was defined by analogy with XQTY0024,
but it could be argued that the analogy is weak because XQTY0024 applies only
to element constructors.
Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2008 01:09:58 UTC