- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 21:59:23 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5351
------- Comment #2 from mike@saxonica.com 2008-01-08 21:59 -------
Just a reminder that whoever drafts the erratum on this should add an entry to
the XPath 1.0 backwards compatibility appendix. In XPath 1.0, (and in XPath 2.0
until today), processing-instruction('123abc'), like @comment(), was a
legitimate if perverse way of denoting the empty node-set.
Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2008 21:59:26 UTC