- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 19:06:26 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5340 ------- Comment #3 from zhen.liu@oracle.com 2008-01-08 19:06 ------- I think that the 'update atomcity' and 'testablity of it' are two orthorgonal issues. I agree that the 'testability' is an issue. Of course, testing using deep-equal() is not bullet proof. However, 'testability' should NOT affect the rule of 'update atomicity' in the spec. I agree that for some in memory implemetations, it is very costly to guarantee atomicity whereas for DB based implementation, it is natural given the transaction capability in DB. However, given the fact that XQuery can be widely implemented in both DB and mid-tier in memory processor, it is probably better to give an implementation a configurable choice to state if they can guarantee such atomicity.
Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:06:29 UTC