- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 10:16:14 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5332 ------- Comment #6 from mike@saxonica.com 2008-01-08 10:16 ------- My proposal was to use the phrase knowing that it described behaviour that would not be fully interoperable. This is analogous with the pessimistic static typing rules - implementations that can make better inferences than those defined in the spec are allowed to do so. Of course, if someone can come up with a better proposal, I'd jump at it. This is the best solution I can come up with.
Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2008 10:16:20 UTC