- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:26:53 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5340 ------- Comment #4 from jonathan.robie@redhat.com 2008-02-26 15:26 ------- There was no consensus for making this change at the face-to-face. This is not testable within an update because of snapshot semantics, but the scripting extensions will make these assertions testable, and subsequent queries can also make this testable in environments that persist changes. We define all updates in term of an XML instance, and atomicity is defined the same way. While we say nothing about how an XDM instance is made available to an application, this is not more of an issue for atomicity than it is for other aspects of the update spec.
Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2008 15:27:04 UTC